Mark Thorson
2015-03-10 03:36:13 UTC
Consumer Health Digest has an item about the recent
lawsuit against the manufacturer of Prevagen:
http://www.ncahf.org/digest15/15-06.html
Quoting from this article:
http://www.isthmus.com/isthmus/article.php?article=41552
Far more scathing in his criticism is UW-Madison
neuroscientist Baron Chanda. "This product doesn't
make sense. It's basically quackery," he says after
reviewing some of the online Prevagen research.
He says there is no way the apoaequorin protein
could survive the digestive tract and make its way
to the brain. Prevagen purchasers, he suggests,
are basically being played for "suckers."
lawsuit against the manufacturer of Prevagen:
http://www.ncahf.org/digest15/15-06.html
Quoting from this article:
http://www.isthmus.com/isthmus/article.php?article=41552
Far more scathing in his criticism is UW-Madison
neuroscientist Baron Chanda. "This product doesn't
make sense. It's basically quackery," he says after
reviewing some of the online Prevagen research.
He says there is no way the apoaequorin protein
could survive the digestive tract and make its way
to the brain. Prevagen purchasers, he suggests,
are basically being played for "suckers."